The History of Curriculum Planning Essay Example for Free

The History of course of instruction Planning EssayAn effective computer program depends on its design. When developing and cookery a syllabus, educators must focus on student success. According to Danielson (2002), educators follow clearly defined step that are designed to link the local curriculum to state and district content standards (p. 81). Once a state has established a Standard Course of Study, educators can design a curriculum that ordain provide the most appropriate schooling possible for the diverse learners in that state. This forget fig up students to come successful, contributing members in a 21st century society and global economy. In this paper, the author discusses the diachronic and political influences on the current curriculum practices, the effects of positioning of meat Language Learners (ELL) and Sheltered Instruction ceremonial Protocol (SIOP) laws hold in on curriculum development, and the impact of keen education on the evolution of c urriculum development.Many political and historical influences on education come to mind, notably, the No Child Left tush (NCLB) act and cases involving religion. Politics plays a very important part in curriculum development. The main voice of politics is funding. Educational institutions rely on funding from federal, state, and local governments. These funds are used to require personnel, build and maintain educational facilities, and purchase resources needed to define established goals. Failed programs such as No Child Left Behind have proved to be expensive and sheathd an increase in the actment gaps among students. Designed to bridge achievement gaps, NCLB has not tendinged, but because it focuses on high-stakes testing, increased funding is needed to suffer for the training, testing materials, and administration.Furthermore, NCLB focuses on literacy and math, leaving little time in curriculum for history, science, and the arts. Any balanced curriculum should highlight the interconnectedness of various knit stitchs of knowledge, expose students to awide variety of experiences that can help them clarify their interests and talents, and incorporate appropriate ongoing assessment to gauge student mastery (Cawelti, 2006, p. 67). Not solely are there the issue of narrowed curricula and funding, research indicates NCLB has detrimental effects on minority and low-income students ((Woolhether, 2012). These students do receive the best education possible, because they are faced with overcrowded classrooms and apprizeers whose priority is teaching to the test. Education will continue to suffer as students are coached to pass tests and not taught a curriculum that will prepare them to live and participate in the 21st century. The other issue, school petitioner and religion expression, has an impact on curriculum. Even though the court case Engel vs. Vitale (1962) sided with Engel concerning prayer in schools, it did not quell the issue of religion. Educa tors have to be careful when selecting resources for the curriculum. Choosing activities with religious undert 1s could pose problems for educators, such as musical and reading selections.However the move toward giving religion a role in education includes establishing guidelines that specify how students can pray in school, how religious clubs can have access to school facilities, and how teachers can incorporate religion into the curriculum (Brown, 2012). increase immigration in the United States has led to a large population of clawren who live in homes where English is not the primary language. To provide the best possible education for these diverse students, curriculum planning must include elementary school programs, such as ELL (English Language Learners) and SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol) that address their needs. virtually schools may offer several programs to accommodate these students while other schools may offer only one program. Some identified p rograms are (1) the English-language monolingual program where the child is in a regular English-language monolingual classroom (2) the English-monolingual-plus-ESL program where the child is in a regular English-language monolingual classroom, but receives instruction in English as a Second Language (ESL) (3) the Transitional multilingual education program where the child is fixed in a bilingual education classroom and receives some form of English-language instruction, but as well as is taught in Spanish(4) Maintenance bilingual education program, where children are placed in a bilingual education classroom and receives some form of English- Spanish instruction.This program helps students develop full proficiency in both languages (5) the structured immersion program where the child is in a classroom in which the casing matter is presented in English, but in a manner that students with limited English-language proficiency is insufficient (Honigsfeld, 2009). These programs are beneficial if the number of ESL teachers to student ratio is sufficient. Often funding issues lead to budget cuts in these areas. A positive for NCLB is that it allocates extra support for programs designed to help ELL students progress. The impact of happy education on the planning of the curriculum is positive, but may also have some negative effects. The use of the multidimensional plan Model (MdCM) helps educators to better prepare gifted students for the changing world, providing them with the skills needed for the 21st century (Vidergor, 2010). This exercise could be used as a framework for curriculum design and development that will reach and teach gifted students. The negative effects of gifted education include funding issues for hiring teachers capable of teaching gifted students and tryst of funds.Again, movements such as NCLB have overlooked the population of gifted students. Collaboration and planning a curriculum that uses differentiated instruction is an effective way to reach gifted students. Since funding is in all of a sudden supply for gifted education, reaching out to community leaders will help them gain an fellow feeling of the needs of gifted children. This can help dispel the myth that gifted children can make it on their own (Roberts Siegle, 2012). To save gifted education and serve gifted students, some schools are turning to the schoolwide Cluster Grouping Model (SCGM). When implemented well, the SCGM represents one viable solution for providing effective and consistent gifted services within certain budget restraints (Brulles Winebrenner, 2011, p. 35). This model allows school leaders to embed gifted education services into the school system, making it possible that all students needs are met (Brulles Winebrenner, 2011).Funds will nonetheless have to be allocated for teacher training. Classroom instruction should reflect societal needs, the needs of students, and recommendations of experts in their field of study. These ar e important components when planning an effective curriculum. It is clear that ELL program models do not work for everyone, in other words, one size does not fit all. NCLB has proven beneficial by the allocation of funds to certain departments however, itmust be revisited and revamped before it will be completely effective. Unfortunately, it does solve the problems that cause students to be left behind. NCLB also has a negative impact on gifted education. Emphasis is placed on lower achieving students and efforts to make these students proficient on standardized tests. A well-planned curriculum should be loaded and demand from students higher-order thinking skills.ReferencesBrown, M. (2012). 50 years later High courts school prayer ruling still fuels religious liberty debate. Deseret News. Retrieved July 15, 2013 from http//www.deseretnews.com/article/865558046/50-years-later-High-courts-school-prayer-ruling-still-fuels-religious-liberty-debate.html?pg=all Brulles, D., Winebrenner , S. (2011). The schoolwide cluster grouping model Restructuring gifted education services for the 21st century. Gifted Child Today, 34(4), 35-46. doi10.1177/1076217511415381 Cawelti, G. (2006). NCLB Taking stock, looking forward. The side effects of NCLB. Educational Leadership(64)3. 64-68. Danielson, C. (2002). Enhancing student achievement A framework for school improvement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962).Honigsfeld, A. (2009). Ell programs Not one size fits all. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(4), 166-171. Roberts, J., Siegle, D. (2012). Teachers as advocates If not Youwho?. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 58-61. doi10.1177/1076217511427432 Vidergor, H. E. (2010). The 3-dimensional Curriculum Model (MdCM). Gifted Talented International, 25(2), 153-165. Woolhether, L. (2012). The effects of NCLB on low-performing and minority students. Retrieved July 16, 2013 from http//www.ehow.com/info_7930134_effects-nclb-lo wincome-minority-students.html