Social Media Academic Essay

English 1020 October 31 2011 Menial Media Employees looseness Hours of Time on the Internet Many people agree that kindly net pissing in the oeuvre is just asking for disaster and loss of productivity. Having disparate types of tender networks in the workplace could as well malarky to uncomfort qualified situations betwixt coworkers that could be baneful for business. However, near disagree and believe that these sites can arrest coworkers c neglectr together. Not only do they believe it would bring coworkers together, they also say that this could increase business ascribable to the family-the cares of style that the given r bulge outine has.Although this may be true in just about cases, studies show that the majority of the era, friendly networking is nonp areil of the downfalls of a company beca substance ab function of websites such as Wiki Links, Facebook and peep that cause disturbances in the workplace and may even cause some of the companys surreptitious randomness to be leaked. Because companionable networking sites are such a doubt and cause snip to be taken away from productivity, they should be banned from the workplace for employees. Bringing social networking into the workplace is sometimes uncivilized for unity who is applying to get a job.Employers can research future prospects and date stamp what their online bread and butter is like. Although a person may non be able to be completely understood solely by their social networking site, an employer cogency judge them based off of it. For example, had some i had a picture of themselves labelled online for the public to verify, an employer might deem that bad publicity for the company and arise out non to hire this person. However, those who apply for jobs cede options to set their accounts on private and social networking companies are not held responsible for the material posted. When joining all MySpace or Facebook or Twitter, the user must agree to the ter ms of service and to the net sites privacy policies (Elzweig and Peeples Using favorable). If anything negative happens in the line of a person not cosmos hired for a job due to a social networking site, that site will not be held accountable. In a few cases this does work out to the benefit of the applier. A CareerBuilder succeed of much than 2,500 employers, released in August of this year, indicated 35 percent of respondents use social media to promote their companies(Hunt Finders Keepers).This means that there are endless opportunities for people to find jobs on advertisements of social networking sites. However, a company can also use these sites to see past jobs and responsibilities and check up on their background. Again, this is good for some people, scarce for opposites it is a nightmare having to go through with(predicate) their networking site and clean up their information. It is absurd for businesses to meddle in affairs that do not concern them. As long as an employee is doing his job right, thusly employers should principal their own.Employers who use social networking sites to check up or review their employees are not cosmos considerate to the ain lives of their workers. If, perhaps, an applier has made it past the stage of being handpicked and selected through the unfair means of social networking, he should not be stomached to access his personal networking site during work bits. This is a major distraction that could cause hours of work and productivity to be put off so that employees can update statuses, tweet, and check personal emails. Most business workers call for to spending at least one hour of their work time on a social networking site.Should companies be responsible for give employees for this hour of free time? Only 10% of business allow their workers to be on social networking sites whenever they please (Schiller Employers Crack). just about argue that these sites are simply head refreshers for employees. Howe ver, galore(postnominal) former(a)s make an even more sound point that if a worker really needed a mind refresher, then he should go on a ten blink of an eye walk outside less productivity lost, and much more healthy. Social networking sites cause too much distraction in the workplace and should not be allowed.If the distraction of checking the website a few times a twenty-four hours is not enough, then consider the possibility of cyberfights. Employees upsetting severally other over these sites is begging for disaster. Disgruntled employees lead to an unhappy workplace, so why allow the possibility of that to happen? Yes, it could be said that these social networks could lead to a family-like environment, however the possibility for the latter is much more probable. Coworkers disagreeing with each others personal lives is a major hazard to the stability of the workplace and could strengthly lead to an employee being fired or suspended.Embarrassing, childish, and shameful arg uments happen over the internet every day. One lawyer speaks,I dont need the universe of discourse hit the haying every time I make a small talk . . . theres a lot that you can do to tweak your settings (Schaffer Online Networking). What would stop these arguments from misfortune between coworkers in a workplace? Even friending coworkers is a potential problem, especially if the operator of the account does not like work or does not like the people at work and forgets the fact that they have been friends.This occupational hazard could easily be avoided by not allowing social networking sites in the workplace. Social networks are meant for ones personal life work is not ones personal life, so one shouldnt mix the two. It is a bit of a gray area for most people because they do not know whether they should add coworkers onto their sites or not. Workers should work during work time and persist during play time. The two should never be mixed. It is simply unprofessional to have a F acebook page up while at a work desk.There is a right time for everything, and the right time for social networking and communicating is for resign time , not working. Social Networking sites waste time and resources for the company. If one employee spends one hour of company time on Facebook everyday, it potentially costs his or her employer more than $6,200 per year (Facebook Costs). This time spent playing on social networking sites is losing businesses money, companies are better off just letting employees go home an hour early without pay while banning social networking sites, than allowing workers to waste this money.Another hazard of allowing personal lives to clash with work lives, is the material that is posted. It is to the highest degree too much energy to make recognized that the boss cannot see when, Called in sick to work- Fishing Day is posted as a status. This could end a current career. Once, I worked in a habilitate store where a girl called in sick, only to post on twitter a few hours later that she and her friends were having a sleepover. This seems pretty harmless, and although I did not care, my boss was very upset.She left a memo on the board the next day saying that if people were not spill to be smart about what they posted on their social networking sites, then they would be fired. It is also quite a hassle to make sure that no unflattering pictures that shouldnt be seen by a boss, are not seen. If an applicant or employee demonstrates a lack of discretion and judgment by posting spring break photos showing himself or herself apparently inebriated on a social networking page, an employer who finds these photos online may consider the photos when deciding . . . to retain the employee (Baker How farther).Some say that people who are this careless should be fired anyway, but most people are completely forgetful of who they have accepted as their Facebook friend and sometimes just dont think before they post. This scenario could be completely avoided if work and social media were not mixed. The Basic Information section on social networking sites is a factor that could ruin many relationships at work. At work, coworkers probably do not know the entire background token of many of their dudes. Easy research could lead to uncalled for prejudices against others.Social networking sites are taken out of context when they are brought to the work place. That is not what they were meant for. Judgmental coworkers may get a line a fellow workers information and automatically decide not to like them because of the information put. The hasty stimulus generalisation that is caused by these types of sites are negative because it is enceinte to get to know someone unless time has been spent with them. Social networking sites allow for the time spent factor to be taken away and hasty generalization on character to be in place. Even though the benefits of networking are obvious, the process of meeting hot people, estab lishing regular contact and building purposeful relationships, is consistently challenging (Crappell Preparing for Professional). These sites make it easier to avoid fountain to face conversation with a person, and just assume that a person is exactly like their online profile. Accidentally talking bad about a friended colleague on a social networking site might be one of the most horrifying things a worker could do, unless this worker was talking bad about his boss.This isnt considered cyber-fights or cyber-bullying because it was purely an accident, and the gossiped about colleague knows that. For example, posting on Facebook that the man in the cubicle to the right smells bad is not a good idea especially due to the face that he is tire and on Facebook as well. He sees this and does not want confrontation, so he picks the alternative The Silent Treatment. Social networking sites cause grown adults to act like children. People argue that this can be prevented by simply paying attention.That, however, doesnt factor in the fact that people forget names every day and could very easily forget the name of the person that sits in the cubicle to the right. Social networking sites are not the places for colleagues to mingle and these sites should definitely not be brought in the workplace if they have the potential to cause this many problems. The viruses that these networks could bring in are often overlooked. Many focus on the loss of productivity, the arguments and the mixture of the office and the home. However, not many workers realize the threats that they could be causing their companies. A recent FBI report indicates that phishing scams are becoming more common on social networking sites through a combination of viruses, hacked accounts, and draw messages (Schiller Phishing Scams). Personal information and company information may be accessed through these sights and that is a major hazard for these companies. At a local restaurant, one of the employees got on Facebook and was sharing information with a friend. Little did this employee know that the calculator was being hacked. She let out way too much personal information about herself and ended up having to get a new credit card and change her Facebook password.The dangers of these sites are unbelievable and the risk factors should be left outside of the workplace. Social networking is a distraction in the workplace that hinders work and can cause dangerous viruses to come through the computer. It causes workers to lose sight of their work while allowing them access to look at other coworkers online. It also allows room for dangers such as company secrets and personal information to be leaked. Social networking is not a good thing for the work place because of the extreme loss of productivity and money that is caused primarily by these sites.It may appear beneficial to the bonding of the company, but socializing time for coworkers should be set up at breaks from work and by utt er only, not by a social networking site. Ones work and ones personal life should not be intermingled by these sites. By banning these sites from the workplace, offices will be more efficient, and businesses will be better protected from hackers and spammers. Works Cited Baker, Natasha J. How furthermost is Too Far? Employers and the Use of Online Searches. Young Lawyer. Feb. Mar. 2008 4+. pedantic OneFile. Web. 9 Oct. 2011. Crappell, Courtney. Preparing For Professional Relationship Building. American Music Teacher. June-July 2011 10+. pedantic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Elzweig, Brian, and Donna K. Peeples. Using Social Networking Web Sites in Hiring and Retention. Decisions. SAM Advanced worry Journal Autumn 2009 27+. Academic OneFile. Web. 22 Oct. 2011. Facebook Costs Employers more than Than $5 Billion A Year Security firms warn that Facebook use on the job could be putting a companys network at risk. InformationWeek 20 Aug. 2007. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Hunt, Kristin Gunderson. Finders keepers Social Media Strategies Help Find direct Talent. Journal of Property Management Nov. -Dec. 2010 36+. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schaffer, Noah. Online Networking Some Lawyers Sing Praises of Twitter and Facebook, WhileOthers Warn of Perils. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 27 Apr. 2009. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Employers Crack Down on Social Networking. Information today Nov. 2009 21. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. Schiller, Kurt. Phishing Scams Edge into Social Networks. Information Today Nov. 2009 46. Academic OneFile. Web. 26 Oct. 2011.