Explore How Arthur Miller Portrays John Proctor Essay

bottom proctor is the protagonist in the melting pot. The boloney revolves somewhat him and orders how one man battle with his own self conscience. It is launch in Salem with a strong puritan community surrounding the story throughout and gives puritan views on every scenario shown. The story was true and almost researched by Arthur milling machine including factual t rutrical constituents. The episode set between February 1692 and may 1693 has been used as a vivid cautionary tale astir(predicate) the dangers of religious extremism, false accusations, governmental intrusion and false pretences.However to ease the story appeal to a wider audience Arthur added a love subject into the plot. This was the biggest change from the original story and added a nonher genre to it creating a more than maskesting and in depth version of a factual set of events. The overall feel to the plot is closely linked to the House military commission of Un-American Activities (HUAC) in whic h McCarthyism, the politically motivated practice of making accusations of disloyalty, corruption or treason without proper regard for evidence was used.It outseted in the modern 1940s and was characterized by heightened fears of communist influence on American institutions and espionage by Soviet agents. It died down in the late 1950s but inter twines throughout the plot of The Crucible and uses real scenarios from history. The title of the story sums up the conclusion of tail Proctors biography on a safe and sound. A crucible is a pot used to burn impure objects, as they trace out clean and pure once ruted. This is a metaphor for the whole village of Salem as after the event they examine the actus reus of t here counsellings and act like puritans again.This can also be seen throughout the story as crapper Proctor has the impurities of his affair with Abigail and so is relieved of this sin at the finis when he chooses to be rightful(a) and accepts to do what everyone who likes him wants. This is also what his married woman wants as she would prefer him to be pulseless and for assumption than live and be living a lie. John Proctor was not a typical puritan. He had a sharp and biting way with hypocrites and was a man who stuck to his guns. His outspoken mannerisms could some times cause friction, for typeface with Putnam as he tells I seen none children dying, this society will not be a bag to swing around your head.This is a prime example of what Proctor is best at. Taking a air at all the evidence and consequently making a pass off and clever conclusion from it and choosing who to blame. If you were stupid he enhanced your stupidity win by making you feel small. Arthur tells us in his notes that if a character told a stupid or blatantly obvious fact then Proctor would make them seem stupid by pointing out errors or miss judgements. This was a characteristic that won a lot of lever for John Proctor, but also made him a lot of enemies. som e other reason why John is not a stereotypical puritan is the affair with Abigail. Abigail was made to be shown as a young, nasty, malicious missy who had once had an affair with Proctor but had never let it go. She uses her maneuver words to tempt John behind to her and reminds him of the times spent together. Miller uses warm heat imagery here and later on in the play when Proctor is with Abbie, yet again linking back to hell and religion. She tells him of how she remembers clutching my back behind your house and sweating like a stallion whenever I come near. Or did I just dream that?I power saw your face when she put me out, and you loved me then and you do now This lets John reminisce about the times he had with her and the fun that occurred. She then goes on to tell and contrast heat imagery with him burning in nakedness while with Elizabeth and that he is no wintry man. This section is the start of the tragic hero genre for Proctor as the readers and viewers see hes not so perfect and has deep dreary secrets of his own. The audience in this time period would have been shocked with the great(p)ery theme being added, and as a result would have been more interested.The next main event involving John in the story has to be the biggest turning point. As he is in the butterfly he exclaims obstreperously to everyone as the pressure has built up that he has known Abigail. As mentioned earlier this would have stunned the audience and sent them into shock and horror. Adding an adult theme into the story showed more depth and emotion in Arthurs writing, enhancing Proctors darker face and opening him up to the village. On the other hand this only furthers Johns many talents by giving him the courage to admit it.During this nip Johns wife plays a vital and negative role on his life by adding his downfall. To the contrast of Abigail, Arthur uses cold and shallow heat imagery when describing Johns time with her. Its winter in here yet has to fully describe the relationship between proctor and Elizabeth. The quick, tone down and emotionless dialogue between them proves this as well as the spot directions of Elizabeth receiving a kiss from Proctor, almost as if it was a chore. The cold heat imagery here is in total contrast compared to Abigail.As if because shes younger and more tempting then the hot heat represents fossa and the temptation. While the cold heat represents the dead relationship with Elizabeth. Before Elizabeth enters, John tells the appeal of how she would never lie and is a good, pure puritan. She then enters, lies to the court not knowing the consequences and digs a hole for John. This is one of the antiquated cases of Irony throughout the play and varies the methods Arthur used to keep it interesting. Once the court case has been shown the next main predicament is what John is to do.He has been given the opportunity to tell the Court of who has been lying in exchange for his life much like the HUAC cases. This on ly adds to the dilemmas John is approach and turns to his wife. Here they are shown to have there first proper emotional, good-natured conversation. It is in contrast to the short, blunt, snappy conversation in Act 4 and lets them become closer. If anything this is the only positive to come out of Johns death penalty and can be looked upon with happiness. In then completion he doesnt sign the others names and shows that he can be a loyal puritan and a loyal friend.Most volume see this as a selfless thing but he also does it to stay respected and not let others see he has lied. Elizabeth is then happy and I believe this is the reason she spoke to him with such(prenominal) depth. She knew what he was going to do and so respected him for it. His puritan modus vivendi comes full circle as he dies pure and Elizabeth would of rather he died pure than lived falsely. What I believe the summary and the main plot for the Crucible to be is one mans inner struggle with his conscience and gu ilt.When first discipline through it I thought the main focus was on witchery and judgement, but after reading and looking through key points some(prenominal) times I now have different thoughts. John Proctor is a tragic hero towards the start but in the end is loved as a hero. He made his choice and his wife stood by him. This was all that mattered and completed him. I think Millers intent upon this was to show us all that even though mis scoop outs have been made in a life, it doesnt ruin the life itself and instead enhances the options we can take to correct it.